| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: replication commands and log_statements |
| Date: | 2014-08-12 20:49:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20140812204908.GA11022@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:07:34AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If you have a user devoted to it, I suppose that's true. I still
> > > think it shouldn't get munged together like that.
> >
> > Why do we need to treat only replication commands as special ones and
> > add new parameter to display them?
>
> One difference is that replication commands are internally generated
> commands. Do we anywhere else log such internally generated
> commands with log_statement = all?
Good point --- we do not. In fact, this is similar to how we don't log
SPI queries, e.g. SQL queries inside functions. We might want to enable
that someday too. Could we enable logging of both with a single GUC?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-08-12 21:02:24 | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2014-08-12 20:02:06 | minor typo in pgbench doc (2) |