| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]" <KBaker9(at)its(dot)jnj(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2014-08-10 23:11:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20140810231143.GG16422@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com) wrote:
> [Due for a new subject line?]
Probably.
> Our grace period for active backends after unclean exit of one of their peers
> is low, milliseconds to seconds. Our grace period for active backends after
> unclean exit of the postmaster is unconstrained. At least one of those
> policies has to be wrong. Like Andres and Robert, I pick the second one.
Ditto for me. The postmaster going away really is a bad sign and the
confusion due to leftover processes is terrible for our users.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2014-08-10 23:29:12 | Re: 9.5: Memory-bounded HashAgg |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2014-08-10 22:36:18 | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL |