| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parametric block size? |
| Date: | 2014-07-26 17:17:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20140726171759.GI17793@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-07-26 19:06:58 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> The basic claim that I'm making wrt to this benchmark is that there may be a
> significant impact on performance with changing the block size, thus this is
> worth investigating. I think this claim is quite safe, even if the benchmark
> is not the best possible.
Well, you went straight to making it something adjustable at run
time. And I don't see that as being warranted at this point. But further
benchmarks sound like a good idea.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2014-07-26 17:37:51 | Re: parametric block size? |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-07-26 17:14:01 | PL/PgSQL: EXIT USING ROLLBACK |