Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures
Date: 2014-06-19 15:00:51
Message-ID: 20140619150051.GO18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Let's not pretend to support platforms we have no practical way of
> > verifying.
>
> This is key. The buildfarm defines the set of platforms we support.

This means that either Renesas should supply us with a bunch of
buildfarm members for their SuperH and M32R stuff, or they should be
considered unsupported as well.

I don't really care all that much about Linux and the glibc situation on
M32R; I mean that platform is weird enough that it might well have its
own, unheard-of Unix clone. But if people expect to use Postgres on it,
we need BF members.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-19 15:18:28 Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink
Previous Message MauMau 2014-06-19 14:55:04 Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink