| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | Soroosh Sardari <soroosh(dot)sardari(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Memory deallocation after calling cast function | 
| Date: | 2014-06-17 15:32:37 | 
| Message-ID: | 20140617153237.GD3666@momjian.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Tue, Jun  3, 2014 at 03:59:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Soroosh Sardari <soroosh(dot)sardari(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I have problem with memory deallocation. look at the following queries
> 
> > 1- create table test01(a) as select generate_series(1,100000000)::int8 ;
> 
> Do it as, eg,
> 
> create table test01(a) as select g::int8 from generate_series(1,100000000) g;
> 
> SRFs in the SELECT targetlist tend to leak memory; this is not easily
> fixable, and nobody is likely to try hard considering the feature's on
> the edge of deprecation anyhow.
Uh, what is replacing SRFs? CTEs?
-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matheus de Oliveira | 2014-06-17 15:34:36 | How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE? | 
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-06-17 15:29:21 | Re: 9.4 release notes |