Re: SP-GiST bug.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST bug.
Date: 2014-05-30 15:11:51
Message-ID: 20140530151151.GQ28490@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:55:18PM +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >The point I'm making is that the scenario your test case exposes is not
> >an infinite loop of picksplits, but an infinite loop of choose calls.
>
> Thank you, now I see what I missed before. After some brainstorming,
> it's possible to use '\0' only as end of string marker. The idea
> is: when we split allthesame tuple to upper/lower we copy node label
> to upper tuple instead of set it to '\0'. Node labels of lower tuple
> will be unchanged but should be ignored for reconstructionValue -
> and they are ignored because of allTheSame flag. See attached
> patch.
>
> Unfortunately, it will break on-disk compatibility. Although it will
> not cause a panic/error/coredump allTheSame approach will not find
> tuples. Users should recreate spgist indexes over text column.

If we bump the system catalog version, pg_upgrade can mark those indexes
as invalid and output a script to reindex them.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-05-30 15:14:43 Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots
Previous Message Greg Stark 2014-05-30 15:09:15 Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots