Re: buildfarm: strange OOM failures on markhor (running CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: buildfarm: strange OOM failures on markhor (running CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY)
Date: 2014-05-17 19:31:40
Message-ID: 20140517193140.GR23662@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-05-17 20:41:37 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 17.5.2014 19:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
> The tests are already running, and there are a few postgres processes:
>
> PID VIRT RES %CPU TIME+ COMMAND
> 11478 449m 240m 100.0 112:53.57 postgres: pgbuild regression [local]
> CREATE VIEW
> 11423 219m 19m 0.0 0:00.17 postgres: checkpointer process
> 11424 219m 2880 0.0 0:00.05 postgres: writer process
> 11425 219m 5920 0.0 0:00.12 postgres: wal writer process
> 11426 219m 2708 0.0 0:00.05 postgres: autovacuum launcher process
> 11427 79544 1836 0.0 0:00.17 postgres: stats collector process
> 11479 1198m 1.0g 0.0 91:09.99 postgres: pgbuild regression [local]
> CREATE INDEX waiting
>
> Attached is 'pmap -x' output for the two interesting processes (11478,
> 11479).

Could you gdb -p 11479 into the process and issue 'p
MemoryContextStats(TopMemoryContext)'. That should print information
about the server's allocation to its stderr.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2014-05-17 19:36:59 [9.4] Minor SSL/ECDH related doc fixes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-05-17 19:29:02 Re: %d in log_line_prefix doesn't work for bg/autovacuum workers