Re: Weird behaviour with the new MOVE clause of ALTER TABLESPACE

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Weird behaviour with the new MOVE clause of ALTER TABLESPACE
Date: 2014-05-10 20:04:36
Message-ID: 20140510200436.GU2556@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Guillaume Lelarge (guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info) wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. I should have RTFM before complaining. Sorry
> for the noise :)

No prob. If people don't feel that makes sense then we can still change
it.. I don't feel particularly strongly either way, though I seem to
recall my testing showing that we already treated information schema
differently from catalog tables in some ways (though I don't recall
offhand exactly how).

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-05-10 20:22:46 Re: min_recovery_apply_delay
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-05-10 20:02:39 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API