Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Date: 2014-05-08 13:49:07
Message-ID: 20140508134907.GB27830@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2014-05-06 23:55:04 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> If helps, I added some regression tests to the lastest patch.

I think we should apply this patch now. It's much more sensible with the
opclasses present and we don't win anything by waiting for 9.5.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-05-08 14:01:26 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-05-08 13:49:04 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API