Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, girgen(at)freebsd(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, ftigeot(at)wolfpond(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-24 00:26:25
Message-ID: 20140424.092625.739542093076646836.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> >> Included is the graph (from PostgreSQL Enterprise Consortium's 2014
>> >> report page 13: https://www.pgecons.org/downloads/43). I see up to 14%
>> >> degration (at 128 concurrent users) comparing with 9.2.
>> >
>> > That URL returns 'Forbidden'...
>>
>> Sorry for this. I sent a problem report to the person in charge. In
>> the mean time, please go to:
>> https://www.pgecons.org/download/works_2013/ then click the link "2013
>> 年度WG1活動報告" (sorry for not English). You should be able to
>> download a report (PDF).
>>
>> Also the report is written in Japanese. I hope you can read at leat
>> the graph in page 13 and the table in page 14.
>>
> Is pgecons planning to do a translation of that at some point? It looks
> like good material, and the audience able to understand it is rather
> limited now :)

Yeah, once I proposed a translation of the documents by professional
translators to the organization. Their decision was "no". The main
reason was cost. The document is huge and the translation work could
cost tremendously. So unless someone comes up for volunteering the
translation work, the document would not be translated.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-04-24 00:27:52 Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table
Previous Message David Fetter 2014-04-23 23:25:18 Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table