From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql |
Date: | 2014-04-10 02:43:45 |
Message-ID: | 20140410024345.GA31142@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:15:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I see a filter on pg_catalog for pg_proc. Is there a reason there isn't
> > one for pg_extension?
>
> Extensions don't live in schemas.
That's what I thought too, but I see a schema file in pg_extensions:
test=> \d pg_extension
Table "pg_catalog.pg_extension"
Column | Type | Modifiers
----------------+---------+-----------
extname | name | not null
extowner | oid | not null
--> extnamespace | oid | not null
extrelocatable | boolean | not null
extversion | text |
extconfig | oid[] |
extcondition | text[] |
Indexes:
"pg_extension_name_index" UNIQUE, btree (extname)
"pg_extension_oid_index" UNIQUE, btree (oid)
SELECT extname, extnamespace, nspname
FROM pg_extension, pg_namespace
WHERE extnamespace = pg_namespace.oid;
extname | extnamespace | nspname
---------+--------------+------------
plpgsql | 11 | pg_catalog
(1 row)
Should we hard-code a pg_catalog plpgsql to be skipped in pg_dump?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-10 03:13:57 | Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-10 02:15:28 | Re: BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql |