Re: jsonb is also breaking the rule against nameless unions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: jsonb is also breaking the rule against nameless unions
Date: 2014-04-03 15:28:34
Message-ID: 20140403152834.GG17307@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-04-02 23:50:19 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > I just tried it on clang. It builds clean with -Wc11-extensions except
> > > warning about _Static_assert(). That's possibly fixable with some
> > > autoconf trickery.
> >
> > Ah. That sounds promising. What clang version is that?
>
> It's debian's clang-3.5, which is built from trunk IIUC: 1:3.5~svn201651-1
>
> I have some patches that fix the configure tests to properly use
> -Werror, but I am too tired to check their validity now.

So, three patches attached:
1) fix a couple of warnings clang outputs in -pedantic. All of them
somewhat valid and not too ugly to fix.
2) Use -Werror in a couple more configure checks. That allows to compile
pg using both -Wc11-extensions and -Wc99-extensions in a halfway sane
fashion. I think this is sane, but I'd welcome comments.
3) Fix C89 compliance issue in pgbench, plus minor cleanups. I don't
like the fix here, but I don't really have a better idea.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-a-bunch-of-somewhat-pedantic-compiler-warnings.patch text/x-patch 4.8 KB
0002-Fix-configure-to-test-more-thoroughly-for-the-compil.patch text/x-patch 5.2 KB
0003-Make-pgbench-more-C89-compliant-in-a-slightly-ugly-w.patch text/x-patch 3.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-04-03 15:37:08 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-04-03 15:20:43 Re: json(b) equality rules