Re: TABLE not synonymous with SELECT * FROM?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Colin 't Hart <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TABLE not synonymous with SELECT * FROM?
Date: 2014-03-08 01:57:44
Message-ID: 20140308015744.GD16324@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:28:07AM +0100, Colin 't Hart wrote:
> David et al,
>
> How about something like this?

I have applied a modified version of your patch. I didn't like the
idea of putting "SELECT" inside an OR syntax clauses --- the syntax is
already too complicated. I also didn't like moving the TABLE mention up
in the file. What I did do was to document the supported TABLE clauses,
and add some of your verbiage. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
select.diff text/x-diff 2.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-03-08 03:03:42 Re: tcp_keepalives_idle
Previous Message Martín Marqués 2014-03-08 00:46:49 Regression test errors