Re: psql should show disabled internal triggers

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 07:23:50PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-02-24 13:16:39 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 07:09:29PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2014-02-24 12:45:12 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:04:45PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > As others, I am concerned about people being confused when funny-looking
> > > > > trigger names suddenly appearing when you disable all table triggers.
> > > > >
> > > > > What I ended up doing is to create a user and internal section when
> > > > > displaying disabled triggers:
> > > > >
> > > > > Disabled user triggers:
> > > > > check_update BEFORE UPDATE ON orders FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE trigf()
> > > > > Disabled internal triggers:
> > > > > "RI_ConstraintTrigger_c_16409" AFTER INSERT ON orders FROM customer NOT DEF ...
> > > > > "RI_ConstraintTrigger_c_16410" AFTER UPDATE ON orders FROM customer NOT DEF ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I kept the "Triggers" section unchanged, showing only user triggers. I
> > > > > also updated the code to handle 8.3+ servers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Patch attached.
> > > >
> > > > Patch applied.
> > >
> > > Thanks. It'd have been nice tho, to mention Fabrízio in the commit
> > > message as the patch's author.
> >
> > Uh, I was thinking of that, but I basically rewrote the patch from
> > scratch and changed its visible behavior, so I was worried about perhaps
> > blaming him if it introduced a bug. I should have said "original patch
> > by ...", but because so much of it was new, I didn't bother.
>
> I just seems nicer to relatively new contributors to mention their names
> when they try to contribute.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +