Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date: 2014-02-24 18:05:00
Message-ID: 20140224180500.GF16943@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:14:33AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 09:26:47PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > So, would anyone like me to create patches for any of these items before
> > > we hit 9.4 beta? We have added autovacuum_work_mem, and increasing
> > > work_mem and maintenance_work_mem by 4x is a simple operation. Not sure
> > > about the others. Or do we just keep this all for 9.5?
> >
> > I don't think anyone objected to increasing the defaults for work_mem
> > and maintenance_work_mem by 4x, and a number of people were in favor,
> > so I think we should go ahead and do that. If you'd like to do the
> > honors, by all means!
>
> OK, patch attached.

Patch applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-02-24 18:09:29 Re: psql should show disabled internal triggers
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-02-24 18:03:50 Re: often PREPARE can generate high load (and sometimes minutes long unavailability)