Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1
Date: 2014-02-21 13:27:33
Message-ID: 20140221132733.GB28858@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-21 08:16:59 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I can sympathize with the "too much during init" argument, but I don't
> > see how moving stuff to the first call would get rid of the problems. If
> > we fail later it's going to be just as confusing.
>
> No, it isn't. If you fail during init the use will expect the slot to
> be gone. That's the reason for all of this complexity. If you fail
> on first use, the user will expect the slot to still be there.

The primary case for failing is a plugin that either doesn't exist or
fails to initialize, or a user aborting the init. It seems odd that a
created slot fails because of a bad plugin or needs to wait till it
finds a suitable snapshot record. We could add an intermediary call like
pg_startup_logical_slot() but that doesn't seem to have much going for
it?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-02-21 13:33:29 Re: walsender doesn't send keepalives when writes are pending
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-02-21 13:16:59 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1