Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans
Date: 2014-02-11 17:54:10
Message-ID: 20140211175410.GF31598@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On 2014-02-11 12:12:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, that pretty much sums it up. We introduced index-only scans in 9.2
> (2012) but they still seem to be not usable for insert-only workloads
> two years later. Based on current progress, it doesn't look like this
> will be corrected until 9.5 (2015). I am kind of confused why this has
> not generated more urgency.

I think this largely FUD. They are hugely beneficial in some scenarios
and less so in others. Just like lots of other features we have.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-02-11 17:57:34 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-11 17:15:26 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-11 18:23:19 Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-11 17:12:13 Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans