From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, david(at)justatheory(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: nested hstore patch |
Date: | 2014-01-13 16:03:31 |
Message-ID: | 20140113160331.GB6840@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2014 03:25 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
> >There are errors in the example expressions in "Table F-6. hstore Operators".
> >
> >Attached is a cumulative doc-patch (which includes the changes I sent earlier) which fixes these.
> >
> >I also attach an test perl program that shows the (small) differences in output between what's in that doc table and what
> >one actually gets. (I found these too insignificant to change but perhaps you have a different opinion.)
>
>
> A new version of the patch is attached. It includes all of Erik's
> docs fixes and a small fix by Alexander Korotkov for hstore hash
> ops.
Interestingly, this also include transaction_commit event triggers.
There are also a few PANIC elogs, probably not what's intended.
(I was just giving this a quick skim to see if there's support to build
JSON objects incrementally from C source, i.e. not have to call
functions using the fmgr interface. Apparently that's not the case, but
if I'm wrong please let me know.)
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-01-13 16:05:51 | Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-01-13 15:55:26 | Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs? |