Re: ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value
Date: 2014-01-07 11:30:41
Message-ID: 20140107113041.GB2763@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-01-07 10:45:24 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Overall, I'm leaning towards biting the bullet and always detoasting
> everything in master. Probably best to just leave the stable branches alone.

If we're doing something coarse grained as this, I agree, it should be
master only.

I personally vote to rather just leave things as is, seems better than
this pessimization, and it's not like loads of people have hit the issue.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Ullrich 2014-01-07 11:44:33 PostgreSQL in Windows console and Ctrl-C
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-01-07 11:12:26 Re: truncating pg_multixact/members