| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
| Date: | 2013-12-06 13:38:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20131206133808.GE8935@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-06 22:35:21 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> >No. They are FATAL so far as the individual session is concerned.
> >Possibly some documentation effort is needed here, but I don't think
> >any change in the code behavior would be an improvement.
>
> You are suggesting that we should add a note like "Don't worry about the
> following message. This is a result of normal connectivity checking", don't
> you?
>
> FATAL: the database system is starting up
Uh. An explanation why you cannot connect to the database hardly seems
like a superflous log message.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MauMau | 2013-12-06 13:38:53 | Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
| Previous Message | MauMau | 2013-12-06 13:35:21 | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |