Re: logical changeset generation v6.7

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6.7
Date: 2013-12-03 13:24:46
Message-ID: 20131203132446.GC29581@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2013-11-28 21:15:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK, I've committed the patch to adjust the definition of
> IsSystemRelation()/IsSystemClass() and add
> IsCatalogRelation()/IsCatalogClass().

Thanks for taking care of this!

> I kibitzed your decision about
> which function to use in a few places - specifically, I made all of
> the places that cared about allow_system_table_mods uses the IsSystem
> functions, and all the places that cared about invalidation messages
> use the IsCatalog functions. I don't think any of these changes are
> more cosmetic, but I think it may reduce the chance of errors or
> inconsistencies in the face of future changes.

Agreed.

Do you think we need to do anything about the
ERROR: cannot remove dependency on schema pg_catalog because it is a system object
thingy? Imo the current state is much more consistent than the earlier
one, but that's still a quite surprising leftover...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MauMau 2013-12-03 13:36:13 [bug fix or improvement?] Correctly place DLLs for ECPG apps in bin folder
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-12-03 13:20:07 Re: Extension Templates S03E11