| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Draft release notes for 9.3.2 |
| Date: | 2013-12-02 17:58:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20131202175808.GB15336@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-02 12:26:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I think it might be worth mentioning that (parts) of the data are
> > potentially recoverable without too much effort in all of the bugs.
>
> I thought about that but was afraid that it'd come off like a commercial
> for data recovery services, which didn't seem appropriate. People who
> need this type of service can get advice on the mailing lists, anyway.
Fair argument. Especially when suggested by a person working for a
company providing such services. On that note I'd would take the
following with a grain of salt: I think it's a letting users a bit alone
with their problems. Maybe: "Data might be recoverable."?
Thanks!
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-02 17:59:41 | Re: Trust intermediate CA for client certificates |
| Previous Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2013-12-02 17:57:53 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |