From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
Date: | 2013-11-25 13:35:13 |
Message-ID: | 20131125133513.GA26140@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 08:44:42AM -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > I am not a fan of backpatching any of this.
>
> Here's my problem with that. Here's setup to create what I don't
> think is all that weird a setup:
>
> The cluster is created in the state that was dumped, default read
> only flags and all.
>
> Are you saying that you find current behavior acceptable in back
> branches?
First, I don't need to see a 300-line pg_dump restore output to know it
is a bug. Second, what you didn't do is to address the rest of my
paragraph:
> I am not a fan of backpatching any of this. We have learned the fix is
> more complex than thought, and the risk of breakage and having pg_dump
> diffs change between minor releases doesn't seem justified.
We have to balance the _one_ user failure report we have received vs.
potential breakage.
Now, others seem to be fine with a backpatch, so perhaps it is safe. I
am merely pointing out that, with all backpatching, we have to balance
the fix against possible breakage and behavioral change.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2013-11-25 16:29:53 | Re: Re: corruption issue after server crash - ERROR: unexpected chunk number 0 |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2013-11-25 10:10:29 | Re: Solution for Synonyms |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajeev rastogi | 2013-11-25 13:37:17 | Re: PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" |
Previous Message | Sawada Masahiko | 2013-11-25 12:02:47 | Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit |