Status of FDW pushdowns

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Cc: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Denis Lussier <denis(dot)lussier(at)openscg(dot)com>
Subject: Status of FDW pushdowns
Date: 2013-11-21 15:05:15
Message-ID: 20131121150515.GC23976@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Where are we on the remaining possible pushdowns for foreign data
wrappers, particularly the Postgres one? I know we do WHERE restriction
pushdowns in 9.3, but what about join and aggregate pushdowns? Is
anyone working on those?

I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict what
data must be passed back because you would only pass back joined rows.

Do we document these missing features anywhere?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-11-21 15:07:53 Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-21 15:02:00 Re: [PERFORM] Cpu usage 100% on slave. s_lock problem.