Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Date: 2013-11-21 00:38:51
Message-ID: 20131121003851.GK18801@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-11-20 16:36:46 -0800, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > On 2013-11-20 15:52:22 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Oh, so this doesn't just happen when the base backup is first taken;
> >> *any* time the standby is restarted, it can happen. (!!!)
> >
> > Yes.
>
> So, to be completely clear, any secondary running the affected
> versions which is started with hot_standby=on could potentially be
> corrupted even if it never connects to a primary?

Yes.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rodolfo Campero 2013-11-21 01:39:49 Re: information schema parameter_default implementation
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2013-11-21 00:36:46 Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1