| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1 |
| Date: | 2013-11-19 18:51:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20131119185127.GF7240@alap2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-11-19 10:43:14 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I think this last issue shows that it's critical as a community to have
> such a testing framework in place, otherwise we really need to halt all
> work on replication until we have such a thing.
> I can't see how you expect to complete streaming logical replication
> without a replication testing framework.
That's actually easier to test since you can relatively easily integrate
it into pg_regress and isolationtester - thus the patchset actually
contains tests.
You seem to imply that I/we should do that work? That's a bit onesided,
isn't it?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-11-19 18:51:28 | Re: additional json functionality |
| Previous Message | David Johnston | 2013-11-19 18:43:23 | Re: additional json functionality |