Re: Master-Master replication

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>
To: Ricardo Esteves <maverick(dot)pt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-cluster-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Master-Master replication
Date: 2013-10-10 14:44:17
Message-ID: 20131010144417.GO17739@broken.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cluster-hackers

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:59:23PM +0100, Ricardo Esteves wrote:
> Can someone tell me what's the best option for master-master replication on
> PostgreSQL?

There is no "best", it depends on what your definition of master-master is,
for one thing. As mentioned, Bucardo is one option. pg-pool might be another
one, as well as rubyrep. They all have their pros and cons, so you would
need to explain your use case. Bucardo is probably the one closest to
the traditional MySQL-like master-master.

--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)endpoint(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-cluster-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ricardo Esteves 2013-10-14 13:12:05 Re: Master-Master replication
Previous Message Rosser Schwarz 2013-10-10 07:51:55 Re: Master-Master replication