| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2013-10-01 21:06:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20131001210600.GJ5235@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier escribió:
> Btw, taking the problem from another viewpoint... This feature has now
> 3 patches, the 2 first patches doing only code refactoring. Could it
> be possible to have a look at those ones first? Straight-forward
> things should go first, simplifying the core feature evaluation.
I have pushed the first half of the first patch for now, revising it
somewhat: I renamed the functions and put them in lmgr.c instead of
procarray.c.
I think the second half of that first patch (WaitForOldSnapshots) should
be in index.c, not procarray.c either. I didn't look at the actual code
in there.
I already shipped Michael fixed versions of the remaining patches
adjusting them to the changed API. I expect him to post them here.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-10-01 21:06:52 | Re: error out when building pg_xlogdump with pgxs |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-10-01 20:46:12 | Re: SSL renegotiation |