Re: record identical operator - Review

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: record identical operator - Review
Date: 2013-09-27 00:27:34
Message-ID: 20130927002734.GD7113@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:50:08PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think we need to see a patch from Kevin that shows all the row
> comparisons documented and we can see the impact of the user-visibile
> part.
>
> One interesting approach would be to only allow the operator to be
> called from SPI queries.

It would also be good to know about similar non-default entries in
pg_opclass so we can understand the expected impact.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2013-09-27 02:45:41 Re: [PATCH] bitmap indexes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-09-27 00:03:20 Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition