Re: logical changeset generation v6

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6
Date: 2013-09-23 08:46:34
Message-ID: 20130923084634.GA15285@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-09-20 14:15:23 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I have a little bit of feedback that I forgot to mention in my earlier
> reviews, because I thought it was too trivial then: something about
> the name pg_receivellog annoys me in a way that the name
> pg_receivexlog does not. Specifically, it looks like someone meant to
> type pg_receivelog but fat-fingered it.

Yes, you're not the first to dislike it (including me).

pg_receivelogical? Protest now or forever hold your peace.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2013-09-23 08:50:08 Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL
Previous Message samthakur74 2013-09-23 07:56:13 Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation