Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Mel Llaguno <mllaguno(at)coverity(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
Date: 2013-09-10 11:50:18
Message-ID: 20130910115018.GD32160@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:43:16AM +0000, Mel Llaguno wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> First of all, I'd like to thank you for taking some interest in this
> issue. We'd love to migrate to the latest PG version, but this issue
> is currently preventing us from doing so.
>
> Regardless of the DB used (base application schema _or_ restored DB
> with additional app data + base application schema), seed information
> is present in all tests. I guess my question is this - why would
> having existing data change the bind behavior at all? Is it possible
> that the way indexes are created has changed between 8.4 -> 9.x?

I don't know as you have not shown us exactly what is slower between
versions --- you only said the bug appears or not in certain
circumstances.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-09-10 12:20:36 Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
Previous Message Mel Llaguno 2013-09-10 05:43:16 Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?