| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mel Llaguno <mllaguno(at)coverity(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2? |
| Date: | 2013-09-10 01:45:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20130910014541.GB32160@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:36:27AM +0000, Mel Llaguno wrote:
> Let me clarify further - when we reconstruct our schema (without the
> upgrade step) via a sql script, the problem still persists. Restoring
> an upgraded DB which contains existing data into exactly the same
> instance will correct the behavior.
I do not understand what you are saying above.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mel Llaguno | 2013-09-10 02:06:08 | Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2? |
| Previous Message | Mel Llaguno | 2013-09-10 01:36:27 | Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2? |