Re: getting rid of maintainer-check

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getting rid of maintainer-check
Date: 2013-09-04 15:12:17
Message-ID: 20130904151217.GE11189@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-09-03 22:41:17 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The maintainer-check target never really caught on, I think. Most
> people don't run it, and that in turn annoys those who do. Also, it
> doesn't provide much functionality.
>
> I propose that we get rid of it and roll the functionality into the
> regular build.
>
> Specifically:
>
> - Running duplicate_oids during the regular build was already discussed
> elsewhere recently. There are some details to be resolved there, but
> it's doable.

Maybe we should also badger cpluspluscheck into a state where it can be
run as part of a normal build if a c++ compiler was detected?

I think it misses vpath support and it might be dependant on some
bashims.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-09-04 15:15:37 Re: 9.4 regression
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-09-04 15:10:29 Re: [v9.4] row level security