Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited
Date: 2013-07-09 09:48:42
Message-ID: 20130709094842.GB8613@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-07-09 08:00:52 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> > Ok, I've committed this patch now. Finally, phew!
> +1. Great patch!

And one more: +1

There seem to be quite some lowhanging fruits to make stuff faster after
this bottleneck is out of the way. The by far biggest thing visible in
profiles seems to be the CRC32 computation atm...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2013-07-09 10:25:50 Re: Add regression tests for ROLE (USER)
Previous Message Markus Wanner 2013-07-09 08:20:45 Re: Millisecond-precision connect_timeout for libpq