Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax

On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 03:22:33AM +0200, Karol Trzcionka wrote:
> Hello,
> according to my mentor's suggestion, I send first PoC patch of
> "RETURNING AFTER/BEFORE" statement. Some info:
> - it is early version - more hack PoC than RC patch
> - AFTER in this version works as decribed before but it returns row
> after update but before post-update before (to be fixed or switch with
> current "*" behaviour - I don't know yet)
> - patch passes all regression tests
> - the code is uncommented already, to be fixed
> I'm not sure what may fail so you use it on your risk ;)
> Regards,
> Karol

Karol,

Per discussion in IRC, please follow up with your patch that includes
such documentation, new regression tests, etc., you've written for the
feature.

Thanks! :)

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate