Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS
Date: 2013-06-19 19:06:23
Message-ID: 20130619190623.GT3537@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/19/13 12:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > So you're saying to install extension headers, but into the main
> > directory where we put server headers?
>
> Yes, if we choose to install some extension headers, that is where we
> should put them.

The question of the name of the directory still stands. "contrib" would
be the easiest answer, but it's slightly wrong because
externally-supplied modules could also want to install headers.
"extension" might be it, but there are things that aren't extensions
(right? if not, that would be my choice).

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gražvydas Valeika 2013-06-19 19:22:01 Re: pg_dump cosmetic problem while dumping/restoring rules
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-06-19 19:01:30 Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])