Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Date: 2013-06-10 05:28:10
Message-ID: 20130610052810.GE15368@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis wrote:

> --- 1000,1015 ----
> strcat (flagString, "HASEXTERNAL|");
> if (infoMask & HEAP_HASOID)
> strcat (flagString, "HASOID|");
> + if (infoMask & HEAP_XMAX_KEYSHR_LOCK)
> + strcat (flagString, "XMAX_KEYSHR_LOCK|");
> if (infoMask & HEAP_COMBOCID)
> strcat (flagString, "COMBOCID|");
> if (infoMask & HEAP_XMAX_EXCL_LOCK)
> strcat (flagString, "XMAX_EXCL_LOCK|");
> ! if (infoMask & HEAP_XMAX_SHR_LOCK)
> ! strcat (flagString, "XMAX_SHR_LOCK|");
> ! if (infoMask & HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY)
> ! strcat (flagString, "XMAX_LOCK_ONLY|");
> if (infoMask & HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED)
> strcat (flagString, "XMIN_COMMITTED|");
> if (infoMask & HEAP_XMIN_INVALID)

Hm, note that XMAX_SHR_LOCK is two bits, so when that flag is present
you will get the three lock modes displayed with the above code, which is
probably going to be misleading. htup_details.h does this:

/*
* Use these to test whether a particular lock is applied to a tuple
*/
#define HEAP_XMAX_IS_SHR_LOCKED(infomask) \
(((infomask) & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) == HEAP_XMAX_SHR_LOCK)
#define HEAP_XMAX_IS_EXCL_LOCKED(infomask) \
(((infomask) & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) == HEAP_XMAX_EXCL_LOCK)
#define HEAP_XMAX_IS_KEYSHR_LOCKED(infomask) \
(((infomask) & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) == HEAP_XMAX_KEYSHR_LOCK)

Presumably it'd be better to do something similar.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2013-06-10 06:03:12 Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2013-06-10 05:17:32 Re: Eliminating PD_ALL_VISIBLE, take 2