| From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
| Date: | 2013-05-13 19:00:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20130513190004.GA11219@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 10:57:44PM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Other than adminpack, I know of PGQ installing their objects in
> pg_catalog. They only began doing that when switching to the CREATE
> EXTENSION facility. And they set relocatable to false.
FYI - PgQ and related modules install no objects into pg_catalog.
I used schema='pg_catalog' because I had trouble getting schema='pgq'
to work. I wanted 'pgq' schema to live and die with extension,
and that was only way I got it to work on 9.1.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-05-13 19:05:00 | 9.3 prepare plans - possible incompatibility |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-05-13 18:55:16 | Re: Parallel Sort |