Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report
Date: 2013-04-22 20:06:26
Message-ID: 20130422200626.GD30155@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:11:48PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >Allow tooling like pg_receivexlog to run on computers with different architectures (Heikki Linnakangas)
>
> This probably should be mentioned in the backwards-compatibility
> section. Any 3rd party tools that speak the streaming replication
> protocol are affected.
>
> >E.1.3.2.1. Write-Ahead Log (WAL)
> >
> > Store WAL in a continuous stream, rather than skipping the last 16MB segment every 4GB (Heikki Linnakangas) BACKWARD COMPATIBLE BREAK
> >
> > Restructure WAL files to better handle timeline changes during recovery (Heikki Linnakangas)
> >
> > Restructure WAL files to use a more compact storage format (Heikki Linnakangas)
>
> Can you clarify which commits these came from? The first one is
> clear (dfda6eba), and I think the 3rd covers commits 20ba5ca6 and
> 061e7efb1. But what is that second entry?

Frankly, I found the WAL and timeline commits all over the place and
could hardly make sense of it. I tried to collapse entries into
meaningful items, but I need help. Can you suggest changes?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anne Rosset 2013-04-22 20:15:38 Re: Performance with the new security release?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-04-22 20:05:12 Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report