| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SIGHUP not received by custom bgworkers if postmaster is notified |
| Date: | 2013-04-10 19:11:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20130410191152.GS3751@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached a simple example of bgworker that logs a message each
> time a SIGTERM or SIGHUP signal is received by it:
> - "hello signal: processed SIGHUP" when SIGHUP is handled by my example
> - "hello signal: processed SIGTERM" when SIGTERM is handled by my example
I committed some improvements to worker_spi this morning that I think
enough demostrate signal handling capabilities, which I think is what
your submitted code would do. If you see more use for a separate body
of sample worker code, by all means do submit that.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-04-10 19:17:08 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-04-10 19:10:03 | Re: SIGHUP not received by custom bgworkers if postmaster is notified |