Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Date: 2013-04-09 09:55:57
Message-ID: 20130409095557.GC16657@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> I'm not arguing either way here... but if you think of DBaaS as "the
> new packaging", it starts to seem more reasonable to give folks like
> Heroku access at the same time as the traditional packagers.

Good point. Isn't this along the same lines as Damien's posting, in that we
should not be on the hook for their deployment time?

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas J Hunley 2013-04-09 12:52:24 Re: elephant logo in OFM format?
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2013-04-09 09:54:12 Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions