Re: Getting to 9.3 beta

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting to 9.3 beta
Date: 2013-03-29 17:00:57
Message-ID: 20130329170057.GL2126@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:05:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
> > time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
> > 25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
>
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=17
>
> > What is a reasonable timeframe to target for completion of these items?
>
> TBH, once Andrew commits the JSON patch, I wouldn't have a problem with
> moving all the rest to Returned With Feedback or the next CF. None of
> the others seem to me to be close-to-committable (with the possible
> exception of the Max LSN patch, which I've not looked at), and April is
> not the time to be doing development.
>
> Next week is going to be tied up with the back-branch releases, but
> maybe we could target beta for the week after? The main gating factor
> at this point really would be how quickly we could write some draft
> release notes, so people know what to test.

I have been clearing my calendar with plans to do the 9.3 release notes,
so I am ready to start.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-03-29 17:33:42 Re: Getting to 9.3 beta
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-03-29 16:28:59 Re: Getting to 9.3 beta