| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal |
| Date: | 2013-01-25 20:32:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20130125203207.GO6848@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:29:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Oops, thanks. Here is the right paragraph, same issue:
>
> > If successfully created, a named portal object lasts till the end of the
> > current transaction, unless explicitly destroyed. An unnamed portal is
> > destroyed at the end of the transaction, or as soon as the next Bind
> > statement specifying the unnamed portal as destination is issued. (Note
>
> What is the issue exactly? Seems clear and correct to me ... but then,
> I think I wrote this text, a long time ago.
Tatsuo's complain was that on sentence said "named portal", while all
portals are closed on transaction end. However, "unnamed portal" is
named in the next sentence, so it seems OK.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-25 20:35:59 | Re: setting per-database/role parameters checks them against wrong context |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-25 20:29:58 | Re: Enabling Checksums |