From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <markdilger(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance patch for Win32 |
Date: | 2013-01-24 23:21:34 |
Message-ID: | 20130124232134.GJ21914@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:37:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:54:59PM -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
> > I was imagining that this would be a trap for linux developers
> > who saw nothing wrong with their code until it made it to the
> > build/test farm. That's pretty far down the development
> > process. Of course, it is also a trap in the other direction, for
> > Windows developers who use the pattern but do not include
> > anything equivalent for the non-Windows execution path.
> >
> > On the whole, however, your argument in favor of tighter
> > patterns might be more convincing than my argument in favor
> > of catching bugs sooner.
> >
> > I will start implementing your suggestion for patch v2.
>
> Any progress on this?
I have added this to the TODO list:
Reduce file statistics overhead on directory reads
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1338325561.82125.YahooMailNeo@web39304.mail.mud.yahoo.com
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2013-01-24 23:25:47 | Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-01-24 23:17:18 | Re: Parallel query execution |