Re: logical changeset generation v3 - comparison to Postgres-R change set format

[Catching up on old threads.]

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 03:40:49PM +0100, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On 11/17/2012 03:00 PM, Markus Wanner wrote:
>> On 11/17/2012 02:30 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>>> Is it possible to replicate UPDATEs and DELETEs without a primary key in
>>> PostgreSQL-R
>> No. There must be some way to logically identify the tuple.
> It can be done as selecting on _all_ attributes and updating/deleting
> just the first matching row
>
> create cursor ...
> select from t ... where t.* = (....)
> fetch one ...
> delete where current of ...
>
> This is on distant (round 3 or 4) roadmap for this work, just was
> interested
> if you had found any better way of doing this :)

That only works if every attribute's type has a notion of equality ("xml" does
not). The equality operator may have a name other than "=", and an operator
named "=" may exist with semantics other than equality ("box" is affected).
Code attempting this replication strategy should select an equality operator
the way typcache.c does so.