Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review of Row Level Security

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Review of Row Level Security
Date: 2013-01-03 20:02:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Kohei KaiGai (kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp) wrote:
> IMO, only "parser" should accept command types except for ALL but
> raise an error something like "it is not supported yet" to protect from
> syntax conflicts.

Right, I agree with this.

> Right now, I plan to submit a revised patch with the syntax support
> above, and without support for INSERT or NEW of UPDATE checks,
> as minimum set of functionality for v9.3.

Sounds good.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2013-01-03 20:26:09
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database"
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2013-01-03 19:45:32
Subject: Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group