Re: Review of Row Level Security

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Review of Row Level Security
Date: 2013-01-03 20:02:12
Message-ID: 20130103200212.GF16126@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai,

* Kohei KaiGai (kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp) wrote:
> IMO, only "parser" should accept command types except for ALL but
> raise an error something like "it is not supported yet" to protect from
> syntax conflicts.

Right, I agree with this.

> Right now, I plan to submit a revised patch with the syntax support
> above, and without support for INSERT or NEW of UPDATE checks,
> as minimum set of functionality for v9.3.

Sounds good.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-01-03 20:26:09 Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database"
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-01-03 19:45:32 Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master()