| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow a streaming replication standby to follow a timeline switc |
| Date: | 2012-12-22 13:13:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20121222131318.GA10961@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-general |
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 02:50:12PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hmm, that's a different error than you got before. Thom also
> reported a "requested WAL segment ... has already been removed"
> error, but in his test case, and as far as I could reproduce it, the
> error doesn't reoccur when the standby reconnects. In other words,
> it eventually worked despite that error. In any case, I just
> committed a fix for the scenario that Thom reported. Can you try
> again with a fresh checkout?
Tested today with checkout of 1ff92eea140ccf0503b7399549031976e5c6642e
All worked fine. Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-22 20:01:55 | pgsql: Fix documentation typo. |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-12-21 18:11:43 | pgsql: Fix sloppiness in the timeline switch over streaming replication |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ERR ORR | 2012-12-22 15:24:27 | Question on Trigram GIST indexes |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-12-22 12:26:08 | Re: Simple Query Very Slow |