From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Groshev Andrey <greenx(at)yandex(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1 |
Date: | 2012-12-20 11:49:54 |
Message-ID: | 20121220114954.GH20015@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:41:37PM +0400, Groshev Andrey wrote:
> > See that 786665369? That is the pg_class.oid of the plob in the old
> > cluster, and hopefully the new one. Find where the lob*_pkey index is
> > created and get that oid. Those should match the same names of the
> > pg_class.oid in the old and new clusters, but it seems the new plob* oid
> > is matching the lob oid in the old cluster.
> >
> > Also, pg_upgrade sorts everything by oid, so it can't be that somehow
> > pg_upgrade isn't ordering things right, and because we already passed
> > the oid check, we already know they have the same oid, but different
> > names.
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
> >
> > + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>
> Yes, was the last question. How to find out which version should stay?
> And of course, I forgot to say a great big thank you!
You can pick either name to be the right one; they just have to match.
The oids are fine.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-12-20 12:16:10 | Re: Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap [Review] |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-12-20 11:41:51 | Re: ThisTimeLineID in checkpointer and bgwriter processes |