| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump --split patch |
| Date: | 2012-11-28 18:46:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20121128184648.GC4333@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 16/11/2012 15:52, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> >
> >What happens if you have a table foo and another table "FoO"?
>
> They would go to the same file. If you think there are technical
> issues behind that decision (e.g. the dump would not restore), I
> would like to hear an example case.
create table foo (a int, b text);
create type bar as (stuff foo);
create table "FoO" (more bar);
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-11-28 19:08:50 | Re: json accessors |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-11-28 18:10:17 | Re: InvokeObjectAccessHook versus DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY |